<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>f3yourmind &#187; Haskell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aslamkhan.net/tag/haskell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aslamkhan.net</link>
	<description>"There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Not everything has to be Object Oriented</title>
		<link>http://aslamkhan.net/software-development/not-everything-has-to-be-object-oriented/</link>
		<comments>http://aslamkhan.net/software-development/not-everything-has-to-be-object-oriented/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aslam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erlang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haskell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scala]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aslamkhan.net/software-development/not-everything-has-to-be-object-oriented/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some time now I have been wondering whether we have become completely obsessed with object oriented analysis and design.  Hence my step into the world of functional programming.  This led me first to Haskell and also Erlang.  Interestingly, Niclas Nilsson has posted a thought provoking piece on InfoQ which asks whether Erlang is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some time now I have been wondering whether we have become completely obsessed with object oriented analysis and design.  Hence my step into the world of functional programming.  This led me first to <a href="http://www.haskell.org" title="Haskell">Haskell</a> and also <a href="http://www.erlang.org/">Erlang</a>.  Interestingly, <a href="http://niclasnilsson.se">Niclas Nilsson</a> has <a href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/08/erlang-java-for-concurrent-futur" title="posted">posted</a> a thought provoking piece on <a href="http://www.infoq.com" title="InfoQ">InfoQ </a>which asks whether <a href="http://www.erlang.org/">Erlang</a> is the next Java.  Also, check out the comment on Scala which is now on my radar as well.  Maybe functional languages will be the language for Web 3.0 where semantic interoperability and semantic correctness will be prominent.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Faslamkhan.net%2Fsoftware-development%2Fnot-everything-has-to-be-object-oriented%2F&amp;linkname=Not%20everything%20has%20to%20be%20Object%20Oriented"><img src="http://aslamkhan.net/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aslamkhan.net/software-development/not-everything-has-to-be-object-oriented/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
